TsingHua University - electrical energy magnifier
Dr. Liang Car Video
Hope it doesn't cost to much bandwidth but at least you have links for now.
CoE discussions again
Pretty Girl A: "From our last discussion, if we can use gravitational energy continuously, there is no violation of CoE."
Handsome Boy B: "That is correct. The focus should now be on whether Pulsed Oscillation of a simple pendulum can Lead Out gravitational energy."
Handsome Boy A and Pretty Girl C: "Note the use of the term Pulsed. There should be a certain frequency in applying the Pulses. This is often regarded as the resonance frequency."
Pretty Girl B: "In the TPU device, Steven Mark mentioned that the Pulse frequency should be close to but not exactly at resonance."
Pretty Girl A: "If Pulsed Oscillation works, then Pulsed vibtration, Pulsed rotation and Pulsed Flux Change would also work. That is the essence of the Lee-Tseung Patent."
Handsome Boy B: "Once we understand the above, the magic is revealed. We can concentrate our effort in the building of our Pulse Motor."
But it must be a cascading system.
Most devices lead out some kind of pulses.
Even if it's just an acoustic pulse it can be engineered into rotary motion or electricity.
It's also possible to envision mechanical capacitors. It's just a weight being lifted or a small clock spring. But looked at as an electronic component we seem to know a lot more applications of such small storage.
Using a pendulum A pulse can be applied by a spring, the spring can be wound up in say 10 swings? Resistance would be much like a bit of air friction and we already needed very little energy to wind up the spring. But discharge it at the right time and it will absolutely perpetuate.
Embed objects with the Lee-Tseung Theory
| ltseung888 wrote: | ||
(2) M.Sc. Aeronautics, Southampton University, England (Date omitted) (3) Two Granted US patents on Guaranteed Reliable Broadcast used on Internet. (you can search the US patent database using Lawrence C. N. Tseung as inventor.) (4) Quoted in Prof Andrew Tenanbaum’s Book on Network Operating Systems as one of the important contributors in this field (Internet). (5) International Software Manager for Digital Equipment Corporation, once the number one minicomputer company and the Number 2 Computer Company after IBM. (6) Wrote the first Email program using DECnet in the 1970s on the PDP-11. (7) Taught the first group of Chinese Computer Engineers in 1980 on RSX11M and DECnet. Invited as guest lecturer to Beijing to talk about Networks. (8 ) After retirement, took up the M.Sc. research on Using Kinetic Theory of Gases to explain Lift and Drag. Presented at the Aeronautics University of Beijing in 2004. That was the start of the Energy from Still Air invention. (9) Focusing on Cosmic Energy Inventions since 2004. That was the start of the Lee-Tseung Theory. Many pending patents – now donated to the Chinese People. (10) Present – Benefit the world with Cosmic Energy Machines and the Flying Saucer (Lee manage the China and Japan area, Tseung the rest of the World.) Lawrence Tseung Relevant Question Leads Out the qualification of Tseung as a trained Physicist. |
Long ago I noticed how the biggest scientists all become philosophers and artists. Some guy made the observation that winning a Nobel prize was the best excuse to research nonsense. hehe
I don't claim to be a great scientist, I'm not trying to say you are (haha), the resume should speak for it self(it even speaks English)
I just know the career road around the science park seems to end up at philosophy and art for the real experts. To me this is clearly what science lacks. It lacks philosophical ingredients all the way up to the denial of metaphysics.
Being the lazy person I am I'm fascinated by observing the cutting edge always seems to involve the rediscovery of basic creativity of some kind.
Personally I just keep playing with magnets and discover the most amazing things. I cant be bothered to be impressed by the effort anyone else makes of it. Maybe it's really easy and every one is just dumb? The best way to figure it out in my opinion is to do it my self.
You play GO? I use to be a "great" chess player. As a chess player I was always very disappointed with the stuff people think up. The majority of chess player play a laughable game.
But the fun of chess is not in being the better player. It's in the slow learning curve where you get beaten by players of your own level. I've noticed lots of times how those people who don't know the game have hundreds of times more fun as the whole tournament of dusty "I memorised every opening" kind of people. Games where I have to think "ok, 4 moves have passed now I have to figure out the entire outcome of the game", LOL that's not fun, there one has reached the end of the fun. Chess is best served when you don't know the game, some place in a bar, use much consumptions then one should have an incredibly good time playing chess every now and then.
Art and philosophy makes up a lot more as just science. Scientists always make a horrible doodle in stead of a beautiful drawing. They also make throw away art works in stead of elegant sculptures. The constructions and the drawing should serve as the trophy of the deed. They can be imbued with the ambient mood fields erected by the measurements.
Look at finstrud's drawings.
http://www.galleri-finsrud.no/sider/mobile/tegninger.html
Not yet a Galileo Galilei but his drawings are like separate artworks. He seems to enter the relm of science from it's art side of it.
| ltseung888 wrote: |
| (1) All objects are immersed in gravitational energy fields. |
Thought fields also perpetuate. I now learn I should make science toys in my own name. Besides from it's main scientific function such toy may display various engineering skills and artistic ingredients. Those should naturally rub off onto their user or even just by looking at them.
It's easy to make a pendulum but one may make it into an artifact, one may mass produce.
Art is an important tool for philosophy, just like philosophy is an important tool to lead out science.
