Details of the Lee-Tseung Theory
It will outline the indisputable scientific facts followed by the Lee-Tseung assumptions, postulates, hypothesis etc.
Quote from http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=28#28
Part 7 - Source of energy facts and postulates
Richard: "Let us list out the indisputable scientific facts and the Tseung Postulates. The facts need not be disputed or discussed. Then we can focus on the postulates."
Nancy nodded in support. Here is their list of scientific facts:
(1) All objects are immersed in gravitational energy fields. We are attracted by the Earth, the Sun, the Moon and each other. When we move, there will be displacement. Work and hence energy exchange would be taking place.
(2) If we can use such gravitational energy, we do not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy. This is brought out by the ‘boat in calm water and good sunshine scenario’.
(3) In the magnetic pendulum experiment by Ms Forever Yuen, the frequency increases with magnetic attraction. The frequency decreases with magnetic repulsion. The effective gravitational constant g can thus increase or decrease. If we can draw or Lead Out gravitational energy, then we can also draw of Lead Out Electron Motion Energy (in this case, magnetic).
(4) Electron motion gives rise to magnetic, electric or electromagnetic fields. The orbiting motion gives rise to magnetic forces. The lumping together gives rise to electrostatic forces. The change of orbits gives rise to electromagnetic waves.
(5) All objects interact with one anther via the Electron Motion Energies. For example, we absorb and reflect sunlight. We radiate electromagnetic waves (infrared light and black body radiation effects). Thus we have constant interchange of Electron Motion Energy with our surroundings.
(6) Both the gravitational and electron motion energy fields are huge, non-polluting, available everywhere, including outer space.
End of Part 7
The above 6 points should be scientific facts beyond dispute.
Shall list the Tseung postulates in Part 8 - 10 days from now. This gives people a chance to digest the above scientific facts.
Part 8a - The Tseung Hypothesis or Postulates
Use Parallelogram of Forces on the initial condition when a horizontal force is applied.
This is to complete the vigorous scientific analysis of the Lee-Tseung Theory. Part 7 outlined the 6 points that should be scientific facts beyond dispute. Here we start to outline the Tseung add-ons. The first of the add-on is - The Parallelogram of Forces can be applied to the Pendulum when a small horizontal force is applied.
For example, a horizontal force of 10g is applied horizontally pushing the Pendulum sphere to the RHS. The mass of the Pendulum sphere is assumed to be 60 and thus the vertical force is 60g. Since there is no motion to begin with, we can apply vector addition. In other words, we can apply the Law of Parallelogram of Forces. The resultant force will be given by the Pythagoras theorem and equal to the
sqrt((60*60)+(10*10))* g
= 60.82763g
(Note that the spreadsheet multiplication symbol * is used instead of x.)
Tseung can conclusively say that the application of a 10g horizontal force will increase the tension of the string to 60.82763g. Furthermore, the angle a (between the string and the vertical) will be 9.4624 degrees.
Tan(9.4624) = 10/60 = 0.1667
Sin(9.4624) = 0.1644
Cos(9.4624)= 0.9986
The above are all strictly mathematics. Mathematics cannot lie. (Tseung cannot be wrong up to this point.)
End of Part 8a
Part 8b - The Horizontal Displacement Consideration
Let us assume the length of the Pendulum is L. The horizontal displacement of the Pendulum sphere must be:
L* sin(a)
A hidden assumption is that the Horizontal Pulse Force is applied long enough to allow the full horizontal displacement to complete.
The above equation strictly mathematics. Mathematics cannot lie. (Tseung cannot be wrong up to this point.)
End of Part 8b
Part 8c - The Vertical Displacement Consideration
Let us still assume the length of the Pendulum is L. The Pendulum sphere is now slightly raised. (One of the forum participants argued that the vertical displacement is so small that approximating it to zero is justified. From that he argued that since there is NO vertical displacement, no gravitational energy could be Lead Out. I shall let the reader judge such an assumption from the mathematics displayed here.)
The Vertical Displacement is
L - L*cos(a)
= (1 - cos(a))*L
The first horizontal pulse force of 10g can lift the pendulum sphere up by (1-cos)a))*L. How about the second, the third, the fourth .....the nth? If no energy is lost from the Pendulum System, these effects are additive. We are all familiar with the swing with a small child - we need to push it gently multiple times before it swings high.
Thus Tseung does NOT approximate the Vertical Displacement to ZERO. Can Tseung be Wrong with more exact mathematics?
End of Part 8c
Part 8d - the energy consideration (horizontal)
Let us focus on the energy consideration. In the above case of first applying the horizontal pulse force to the pendulum sphere, there will be no continued motion after the Pendulum reached its New Position. Thus we can ignore kinetic energy at this point.
Work has been done by the horizontal force P. It moved the pendulum sphere a horizontal distance of Lsin(a). Since work = force x displacement, the work done by the horizontal force is
P * L*sin(a)
=P * L*sin(a)
If there were no loss of energy, this work done is equal to energy supplied by the horizontal force. This is stored as tension energy in the pendulum string. This storing of energy is a Tseung hypothesis. It is NOT a common scientifically accepted assumption. Can Tseung be wrong on this assumption?
End of Part 8d
Part 8e - the energy consideration (vertical)
The pendulum sphere moved up vertically by a distance of (1 - cos(a))L. The vertical force is W(60g). Since work = force x displacement, the work done in the vertical direction is
W* L*(1-cos(a))
This energy also goes into the Pendulum System. Can Tseung be wrong on this assumption?
End of Part 8e
Part 8f -The ratio of vertical energy over horizontal energy
This is strictly mathematics
Horizontal Energy / Vertical Energy
= (P*L*sin(a)) / (W*L*(1-cos(a))
= (P*sin(a)) / (W*(1-cos(a)))
= (W*tan(a)*sin(a)) / (W*(1-cos(a)))
= (tan(a)*sin(a)) / (1-cos(a))
Note that the W and L terms cancel out in the final equation. The spreadsheet is available for those who want double-checking. In the particular case of a 10g horizontal force on a 60g Pendulum weight, the value is 2.014.
In other words, approximately 2 parts horizontal energy Lead Out 1 part vertical (gravitational) energy in the particular example.
End of Part 8f
Part 8g - What happens on the second and subsequent Pulse Fo
The above mathematics and Tseung hypothesis is strictly correct in the case of the first Pulse Force on the Pendulum starting from the stationary vertical position. There is a hidden assumption that the Pulse Force lasts long enough for the Pendulum to reach its new position.
What happens on the second Pulse Force?
Assuming that there is no energy loss in the system, when the Pendulum swings back to the vertical position, it will not be stationary. If we apply the horizontal pulse force on the Pendulum sphere when it is coming back at us, the pulse force will slow down the oscillation. To get the best result, the Pulse Force should be applied when the pendulum swings to its highest point and ready to swing back. The best direction for the Pulse Force is no longer horizontal but tangential (or perpendicular to the radius of the swinging circle of the Pendulum).
The more exact mathematical analysis involves the use of differential equations and integrals that may be too much for this forum audience. Thus, Tseung borrows or extrapolates the result from the first analysis and says: "The Second and subsequent Pulse Force will also lead out Gravitational Energy. The exact amount may be different."
End of Part 8g
Part 8h - Effect of the direction of the Pulse Force
In our communication with the PCT patent examiner, we also discussed the effect of the direction of the Pulse Force. We used the case of starting the Pendulum in the middle position with the Tension of the String and the Pulse Force contributing equal force initially. Half of the Weight of the Pendulum sphere is supported by the String and the other half is supported by the Pulse Force. When the Pulse Force is slightly pulled, the Pendulum sphere is raised to its new position. Approximately half of the vertical energy comes from the Pulse Force with the remainder from the Tension in the String.
The details can be seen in the pendulum_OU.zip file in the overunity.com forum (Thanks to Grumpy).
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,919.msg17891.html#msg17891
End of Part 8h - This will be the end of the Tseung Treatment or Hypothesis of the simple pendulum under a pulse force. I do appreciate the opportunity at Tsing Hua University to present interactively now. It was so much easier. This write-up is good and necessary as it will be the basis for a Book later. Others are encouraged to use the material here. I do not intend to copyright the information. It is meant to Benefit the World.
Part 9 - Experimental Proof of Lee-Tseung Lead Out Pendulum
The most direct experimental confirmation is from the Bill Mehess Pendulum. Bill is very clever in
(1) Building his device before our theory was published by PCT on July 27, 2006
(2) Using a Clock Work Pendulum that can be winded up for use for 31 days
(3) Attach two magnets to the Pendulum so that these magnets move in and out of coils to generate electricity.
(4) Store the small amount of electrical energy in capacitors
(5) Use the stored energy to rewind the Clock Work
(6) Use the extra energy to light up an LED light and run some small motors.
See the Mehess Motor in the overunity.com forum and in this forum.go-here.nl.
The other more indirect Pendulum devices are the Milkovic second oscillation and the Finsud Machines.
Thus Tseung does not need to build a special device to confirm the Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory as applies to the Pulsed Pendulum. Such have been done. Thanks to Mehess, Milkovic and Finsud.
End of Part 9
