pulse motor :: FORUM.GO-HERE.NL

pulse motor

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:04:52 (GMT 0)

We are working at it Eric

Thanks for dropping by.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: The Lee-Tseung Theoretical Pulse Motor
Replies: 30
Author: Anonymous
Subject: pulse motor
Post time: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:04:52 (GMT 0)

Eric997

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:42:20 (GMT 0)

This is very exciting and I can't wait for my electricity bill to plummet.

There is a supposedly green building a block from us which is 64 floors of residential units. However it turns out that residents have been shocked that the electric heating is costing several hundred dollars a month this winter, somebody really screwed something up.

Eric
http://www.WindyChat.com
Windy City

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: The Lee-Tseung Theoretical Pulse Motor
Replies: 30
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Eric997
Post time: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:42:20 (GMT 0)

Meeting with Chan and Sun

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 05:48:09 (GMT 0)

Tseung: "I believe that you are aware of the Chas Campbell simple experiment as suggested by Patrick Kelly. Chas could disconnect the input motor after spinning. The output generator and a 75 watt light could be connected. The lamp continued to be on for a long time."

Chan: "We read that. Chas had a problem with overheating of the bearing. He did not have the problem if the input motor was connected."

Sun: "It does not make sense. But this Cosmic Energy thing never made sense to the trained engineers like us. I do not mind replicating it if the resources are available."

Chan: "The temptation of the AERO competition is there. However, I believe the Australian Goverment might step in and prevent the technology from going outside Australia. It happened to the USA 225 HP Pulse Motor."

Sun: "The Wang Shum Ho generator is an example from China. Once the Officials blessed it, we did not have a chance to work on it anymore."

Tseung laughed: "The Flying Saucer will likely be another example. Its military significance is too great."

Chan: "We have done a great deal. If we stop now, we may end up with nothing. I think we should continue on an 'as resource available' basis."

Sun: "There are many ideas I would like to try. But I have to pay for my mortgage, food for my family and education for my child. I wish I can win the lottery. Then I can concentrate on this addiction."

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Meeting with Chan and Sun
Post time: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 05:48:09 (GMT 0)

Re: Benefits to Hong Kong and China

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:40:45 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Met some Hong Kong persons. They raised the question of the Benefits to Hong Kong and China if we succeed with Cosmic Energy Machines.

Any thoughts?

(1) If the theory is first heavily circulated in Hong Kong, there will be jeers and cheers. If the right time is chosen, there will be more cheers than jeers.

(2) If the prototype is demonstrated together with China, the acceptance will be better.

(3) Hong Kong can play its role as International City and International Investment Center to attract Capital. The Stock Market in Hong Kong and China will take a new direction.

(4) The discussion of Model Farms, Villages, Cities will be eager topics for the Hong Kong and Chinese Citizens.

(5) The Flying Saucer and Meaningful Economic Activities will following.

(6) The concepts described in http://www.energy.com/thebook.htm will be implemented.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Re: Benefits to Hong Kong and China
Post time: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:40:45 (GMT 0)

Benefits to Hong Kong and China

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:40:43 (GMT 0)

Met some Hong Kong persons. They raised the question of the Benefits to Hong Kong and China if we succeed with Cosmic Energy Machines.

Any thoughts?

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Benefits to Hong Kong and China
Post time: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:40:43 (GMT 0)

Benifits to the World

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:45:10 (GMT 0)

(1) The Lee-Tseung theory will change all physics textbooks. A new wave to re-examine all known theories will likely discover many "holes".

(2) The developing countries will be much more innovative. They will not blindly copy.

(3) The model farms, villages, cities will gain support.

(4) The Flying Saucers will come out - totally change our lifestyle.

(5) There will be new talks on "meaningful economic activities".

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Benifits to the World
Post time: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:45:10 (GMT 0)

Comments on Lee Cheung Kin concerns

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:47:01 (GMT 0)

(1) If we want to benefit the World, we should look beyond Nationalism.

(2) It does not matter if US, China or other countries have top-secret research in similar areas. If such information is not disclosed, we can assume that they effectively do not exist. They cannot be used to benefit the World.

(3) It is possible that after we have disclosed our information and/or produced products, some governments might disclose their top-secret information and claim that our products could not be patented in their country. This should not deter us from trying our best to benefit the World.

(4) Spies are not friction. Technology spies are not new. Why should we worry? If the information benefits the World, let the World know. There will be the know-it-all debunkers. Let them insult and curse us. The truth will win in the end.

(5) If God is our partner, why worry? If the timing is not right now, it will be right later. We just need to do our best.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Comments on Lee Cheung Kin concerns
Post time: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:47:01 (GMT 0)

Some thoughts from Lee Cheung Kin

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 04:41:10 (GMT 0)

(1) China is already funding and developing a number of Cosmic Energy Projects.

(2) There might even be high level contact between China and USA on Cosmic Energy Machines and the Flying Saucer.

(3) Both sides are trying to find out the details of development of the other side.

(4) The AERO competition is unlikely to draw out the inventors already backed by the Chinese Sources.

(5) International Cooperation may still be a pie in the sky at present.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Some thoughts from Lee Cheung Kin
Post time: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 04:41:10 (GMT 0)

Re: Message from Lee Cheung Kin

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:17:52 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Ah, the big ball of snow is accelerating down the hill. No one can stop it now. People had problems thinking about the technology. This is by far the greatest thing to be accomplished.

Quote:

(3) He has also received strong interest and support from the top Research Groups we presented to a few weeks ago. Since Lee might not be able to go to Beijing himself and Tseung could not present in Chinese, Lee hopes to get that group to help.

You may expect a lot of hobbyists discovering the global lottery.

Quote:

(4) If we go to Beijing, we may be able to get latest pictures and/or video of the Wang, the Liang, the Tsing Hua, the 225 HP Pulse Motor, the Flying Saucer etc. This will need the support from the Chinese Government as some information may be top-secret.

Oh, for example the scalar technologies are much to dangerous for the naive people. Governments may be motivated to do things that look quite weird for those outside the know.

Quote:

(5) Lee believes the Lee-Tseung lead out theory can be further extended to the field of human health. The human body somehow uses Cosmic Energy.

In the "forgotten" health tech chapter I found Royal R Rife, bjorn nordstrom, hulda clark and Robert Beck to be quite interesting. They cured people with magnetism, much like Paracelcius wrote.

It works exactly the same way as John Searl accidentally discovered. His generator would improve peoples health and cure people.

I've investigated it and it's FAR from a claim made by John. There are big medial scientists backing this up. John is just an experimenter in this chapter.

The Rife frequencies oscillate disease particles on their Mortal Oscillatory Rate (MOR) while still inside the person.

Rife used a range of frequencies, one set after another. A specific set of sets would cure a specific disease.

Johns machine worked best against leukemia, Rife also describes a frequency for this.

You should probably be producing colloidal silver. Take much vitamin C and B17 every day (It's in apricot seeds) And see Dr Day

What I find interesting about Searl's generator is that it apparently taps energy from an unknown source on the frequency of leukemia.

This specific frequency match leads me to think the disease has some means of propulsion. It's probably coupled with the oscillation of gravity at the ELF frequencies.

But one thing is for sure, the main frequencies the disease particle/anatomy is trying to get rid of is the same set of frequencies as in the SEG!

Immortality would lead out much innovation.

Quote:

Dr. Bjorn Nordstrom of the Karolinska Institute, Sweden, has used silver in hiscancer treatment method. He says the whole thing is quite simple.

When I read those people and use only little imagination I see that silver and magnetism are described by them in almost in same way. Over and over and over and over again.

They all claim hilarious results but where only allowed to work with people who really didn't have any hope with conventional medicine.

They cured those far advanced & spread out cancers. Rife got a group of people who should have died within a month then miraculously cured 100%.

The Hoxley family learned medicine from a horse. The horse was self medicating and cured his external cancer.

Shows how stupid humans are!

I think it's obvious that diseases are powered by the wheel-works of nature also. A simple energy crisis will eradicate their whole culture.

The whole town is ill here. I simply eat a big bag of kiwi fruit. The bag isn't even empty jet and I feel perfectly cool again. Or I have acquired the mindset of such. I don't really care which of which it is - for now at least. lol I'm pretty sure this flu everyone has doesn't enjoy high dosage of vitamin.

A well oiled machine leads out low friction.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: Re: Message from Lee Cheung Kin
Post time: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:17:52 (GMT 0)

Message from Lee Cheung Kin

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:03:43 (GMT 0)

Message from Lee Cheung Kin

At present, Lee is sick with an unidentified illness. He would like to share the following with the World.

(1) He believes the vector integral method on the ideal pull should be further developed. It will give further insight and understanding.

(2) He has received invitation to present in Beijing to a group "in charge" of new energy technology developments in China under the newly elected Cabinet.

(3) He has also received strong interest and support from the top Research Groups we presented to a few weeks ago. Since Lee might not be able to go to Beijing himself and Tseung could not present in Chinese, Lee hopes to get that group to help.

(4) If we go to Beijing, we may be able to get latest pictures and/or video of the Wang, the Liang, the Tsing Hua, the 225 HP Pulse Motor, the Flying Saucer etc. This will need the support from the Chinese Government as some information may be top-secret.

(5) Lee believes the Lee-Tseung lead out theory can be further extended to the field of human health. The human body somehow uses Cosmic Energy. More research should be done in this area.

Lawrence Tseung

Sickness Leads Out more urgency to pass on the knowledge to benefit the World.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Message from Lee Cheung Kin
Post time: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:03:43 (GMT 0)

Re: The Theoretical Ideal Pull

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:01:02 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Quote:

The theoretical ideal pull for a pendulum is the pull when the pendulum bob swings to its highest position and perpendicular to the arc of motion. How can this be realized in practice?

The theoretical ideal pulse for a balanced wheel is tangential and in the direction of rotation. How can this be realized in practice?

Excellent questions. I do not have a ready answer. Let me open it for the Forum Members.

See http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=2794.msg56370#msg56370.

The four posts by Forever, Gaby and me after some discussions are very informative. The Gaby suggestions are excellent.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Re: The Theoretical Ideal Pull
Post time: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:01:02 (GMT 0)

The Theoretical Ideal Pull

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:42:13 (GMT 0)

Quote:

Excellent questions. I do not have a ready answer. Let me open it for the Forum Members.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Theoretical Ideal Pull
Post time: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:42:13 (GMT 0)

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:38:09 (GMT 0)

Quote:

Question from raivo

* pendulum
it starts to explain some thing and then it like cut-off.
where does the energy come from other than saying the tension of the string?

Excellent Question.

After Step 3, the energy supplied by the push or pulls PLUS the lead out gravitational energy is essentially stored in the pendulum system.

Let us assume that we do not pull the pendulum bob any more. We also assume that there was no loss of energy due to friction, air resistance etc. The pendulum bob should then swing with amplitude equal to the maximum displacement position on the LHS and the mirror position on the RHS. No more energy goes into the pendulum system.

Now after a couple of swings, we again pull the pendulum bob when it swings to its highest position on the LHS in the tangential direction. Once more, we lead out gravitational energy. This gravitational energy again goes via the varying tension of the string into the pendulum system.

The source of energy is gravity. In order for it to enter into the pendulum system, we must use a pull force to lead it out! We must apply the pull force at exactly the right time (maximum RHS or LHS position).

Hope the explanation helps.

Lawrence Tseung
Gravitational Energy is Lead into the Pendulum System via Pulls at the right instances.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject:
Post time: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:38:09 (GMT 0)

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:27:39 (GMT 0)

Quote:

About point 7.

Envision, we create a setup having oscillatory speed. It goes from fast to slow to fast to slow in a nice wave. I ask you, what works better, pulsing it while moving fast or pulsing it while moving slow? Seems simple enough?

Dear Gaby,

If we restrict the setup to the rotation of a cylinder, then adding energy while the cylinder is rotating slowly will lead out gravitational or electron motion energy. The additing of energy will result in the cylinder rotating faster.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject:
Post time: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:27:39 (GMT 0)

Reply to Hans von Lieven

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:35:14 (GMT 0)

Quote:

From http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=2794.msg55692#msg55692

Every engineer knows, and I don't mean because they read it in a book but because they WORK with such things every day, that if you apply a force perpendicular to the natural movement of a body, its movement becomes erratic and it starts losing energy.

This is true for wheels, pendula and anything else that moves.

Hans von Lieven

Dear Hans,

I believe that every Engineer also knows something about Newton's Laws of Motion. An object traveling in a straight line with velocity v will continue traveling with velocity v if there were no other forces acting on it.

In Circular Motion, there will be centripetal force acting perpendicular to direction of motion. Even though there is a force, no work is done because there is no displacement in the direction of the force.

For the Lee-Tseung theory to be applicable, we need the Pulse (periodic Push or Pull) to do work to Lead Out Gravitational or Electron Motion Energy. When we apply it to the circular motion of a pendulum or a rotating wheel, the wheel has to accelerate and decelerate. This is the phenomenon of "if you apply a force perpendicular to the natural movement of a body, its movement becomes erratic and it starts losing energy." The Lee-Tseung Pull or Push is to try to spin the wheel faster (accelerate) and let the Output Energy to slow down the wheel (decelerate).

Most Engineers were trained to try to achieve balanced rotation. For example, to balance a wheel, they put small weights at the rim to ensure balance and constant velocity rotation. This is totally different from the Lee-Tseung Requirement of "Letting the periodic Pull or Push (Pulse)" to do work to Lead Out Gravitational Energy.

What you regard as Engineering Stupidity and Nonsense is vital to the design of the Cosmic Energy Machines. The Wang Device is the clearest example of unbalanced rotation. Details in http://www.energyfromair.com/beijing/wang3a.htm.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Reply to Hans von Lieven
Post time: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:35:14 (GMT 0)

points 7,10 - Rotating stator armature

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:54 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

I can now describe how Cosmic Energy can be Lead Out from:
(1) The first push of the pendulum from rest position to LHS
(2) The second pull from the maximum position on LHS
(3) The third pull after the pendulum swings to the maximum position on the RHS
(4) The subsequent repeat of (2) and (3)
(5) The extension to Magnetic Fields (Electron Motion)
(6) The extension to Electric Fields (Electron Motion)
(7) The extension to unbalanced rotations
(8 ) The extension to pulsed balanced rotations
(9) The extension to flux change systems
(10) The extension to Flying Saucers

It was like building the jigsaw puzzle. Lee and I had the basic idea. As we put in additional pieces, the picture becomes clearer and clearer.

All inventors became in the transition from the thoughts of kids to the thoughts of adults. Read about any of them and you find out they already had the spirit when they where very young. I find myself in the ironic situation where I restrict my discoveries to basic logic of the kind we were born with. And still people cant understand what I'm talking about. I feel 200 years old now. lol

About point 7.

Envision, we create a setup having oscillatory speed. It goes from fast to slow to fast to slow in a nice wave. I ask you, what works better, pulsing it while moving fast or pulsing it while moving slow? Seems simple enough?

About point 10

More RPM means more losses. Eventually the entire machine is lost.(haha)

Assume the following 2 constructions: construction 1: Object A is fixed to a wall, object B is floating in space. A force is erected pushing B away from A. B

construction 2: Object A and object B both having the same mass float in space. A force is erected between A and B pushing both A and B away from another.

In which construction do you think the distance between object A and object B accumulates the quickest?

My point is that we know acceleration becomes increasingly difficult. If we could configure a rotating stator and have it push it self in the opposite direction we could use a single pulse to bring them both into motion. If both sides have the same generator with the same load attached their speed will probably balance out.

This is clearly a much better idea as to send vibrations into a stationary armature. But would it also generate more motion for less current? What do you think?

Take for example the Newman machine, we can build it so that both the coil and the magnet rotate. Having the same speed the number of pulses per cycle would be 2 times as high. The drag would divide it self over both axles.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: points 7,10 - Rotating stator armature
Post time: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:54 (GMT 0)

The Tenth Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:18:23 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Step 10 The extension to Flying Saucers

The first suggestion that the technology could be applied to the Flying Saucer was from a then 13 year old Ms. Wini Woo. She was helping Tseung to do the PowerPoint presentations. When she handed the finished file to Tseung, she said that: "I can build the Flying Saucer now!"

Tseung was obviously skeptical but as an encouraging teacher and family friend, said: "Are you sure?"

Wini: "If your theory is correct, my Flying Saucer will fly."

Tseung had no choice but to focus attention on the explanation.

Wini: "The effective gravitational constant can increase on magnetic attraction. It can decrease on magnetic repulsion. It can be zero or negative. Zero implies floating in mid air. Negative means rising from Earth."

Tseung was astounded. Tseung contacted Bill Fong, an Engineer friend and discussed the issue. They first talked about the Action and Reaction Law of Newton. That Law allows a bullet to shoot out from a gun but will not allow the bullet and gun combination to move as a single unit in any direction. The thought experiment was that if one fired a gun or a cannon in a closed container, the container should not move because of equal and opposite reaction.

However, both recalled that if they put firecrackers in a closed tin can, the tin can could bounce around. One of the possible explanations was that there were holes in the tin can. It was the expanding air ejecting from the holes that caused the bouncing. They decided to suspend a tin can in a pendulum fashion and ignited one large firecracker to check if there were any observable movement. They were willing to go for the second step of having the firecracker in a totally enclosed container and ignite it with remote control.

The primitive first step experiment showed significant movement of the tin can. David Cheung helped by putting a toy electric car in the tin can. The toy electric car caused much movement of the tin can. Tseung, Bill and Wini discussed the matter further. They recalled the spinning top toy. Tseung went out and bought a few of these. Sure enough, after pulling the string hard, the spinning top rose a couple of inches in mid-air.

They then talked about the throwing of the chained ball by the athletes. The chained ball was first swung in circles to build up speed and then let go. The sudden loss of the centripetal force will allow the chained ball to fly tangentially at high speed.

Tseung immediately recalled that many Over Unity Inventions used rotating magnets. What would happen if the magnetic force was suddenly cut or reversed? Would the entire device go up like the spinning top?

What happens if one magnet rotates in a separate cylinder around the 225 HP Pulse Motor setup and that this cylinder is suddenly yanked away from the magnetic field? Will the entire device move in the tangential direction?

The decision was to file a China Patent in mid 2005. The inventors were Wini, Bill and Tseung. The Patent Lawyer mentioned that such a patent might be classified.

Subsequent experiments confirmed the correctness of the decision. Tseung then spent more thoughts on a special ball that can Lead Out Electron Motion Energy and provide propulsion. Tseung coined this ball the Magneto Propulsion Unit. The Nanjing UFO video on youtube.com in mid 2006 seemed to indicate a successful prototype in China. (Tseung was not involved in the design and building of this.) The CIA or the Like Group said that USA and England may have already known similar technology for decades but decided to keep it top-secret.

Then Tseung discovered the John Searl information. Tseung also found that many other Over Unity Inventors also claimed that they could produce the Flying Saucer including Newman, Liang, Milkovic etc. Discussions at Tsing Hua University and with other top Research Institutes in China confirmed that the spinning top behavior as a potential source of propulsion will not violate Newton�s Law of Action and Reaction.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Tenth Step
Post time: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:18:23 (GMT 0)

The nineth Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:18:02 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Step 9 The extension to flux change systems

The previous systems all require physical motion. The question now is - can Electron Motion be induced without physical motion?

The answer is an obvious YES. The first example an Electrical Engineer will think of is the transformer. The AC Voltage and Current can be changed (stepped up or down) via conventional transformers. The Electron Motion on the Primary or Input Side can affect the Electron Motion on the Secondary or the Output Side.

The question is whether additional Electron Motion Energy can be Lead Out? One can try to use permanent magnets inside the device. This was done in the Lee-Tseung-Song China Patent. However, the permanent magnets tend to lose their magnetism under the impact of AC current. The steering current technique such as that described in http://www.flynnresearch.net/ is much better.

I deliberately play low-key on this invention as Lee Cheung Kin is the Consultant to a Japanese Company ready to market such a device.

I believe the most likely commercial products are the competition amongst:
- The Hungarian EBM machine (already announced and demonstrated)
- The Wang Shum Ho Electricity Generator for Home use (in certification)
- The Chao Ching San Car in China (Obtained production license)
- The Electricity Generator for the Village from China (the flagship of General Magnetics)
- The Japanese Flux Change Device (rumored to be in production)
- The 225 HP Pulse Motor from USA (many versions are being prototyped)

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The nineth Step
Post time: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:18:02 (GMT 0)

Comments on the Pulsed Rotation Magnetic Motors

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:28:54 (GMT 0)

Comments on the Pulsed Rotation Magnetic Motors

(1) When there are permanent magnets, it is important to avoid AC current as that would destroy the magnetic alignment and thus the magnetism.

(2) We should be looking for Pulse Circuits.

(3) Determining the resonance frequency and its harmonics is important. Pulsing at the wrong time will not lead out gravitational or electron motion energy.

(4) Most of the known Over Unity Developers do not have a viable theory on the source of energy for their inventions. They will benefit from the Lee-Tseung theory.

(5) Most of the known Over Unity Developers do not realize that they need a mechanism or program to adjust Input Power to External Load.

(6) Most of the known Over Unity Developers do not realize that the Flywheel should be replaced by the Cylinder. The Flywheel effect will help to maintain the rotational speed high.

My expectation is that many known Over Unity Developers have heard of the Lee-Tseung theory by now. However, they need a demonstrated success event to change their directions which they might have followed for many years.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Comments on the Pulsed Rotation Magnetic Motors
Post time: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:28:54 (GMT 0)

The eighth Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:36:44 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Step 8 The extension to pulsed balanced rotations

We can refer to the RHS diagram of Slide 10 in http://www.energyfromair.com/beijing/taiwan2a.htm.

We can apply electromagnetic attraction or repulsion to pulse rotate balanced systems. With balanced systems, we have the following advantages:

(1) The rotational speed can be very high.
(2) There can be multiple pulse points on the wheel.
(3) We can vary the number of pulse points to maintain a designed speed of rotation.
(4) We can vary the strength of the pulses to maintain a designed speed of rotation.
(5) We can use governor circuits to maintain the rotational speed.
(6) We can have the magnetic field in any direction. Thus the axis of rotation can be in any direction.
(7) The magnetic field can be much stronger than the Gravitational Field.
(8 ) The factors depending on how much Gravitational or Electron Motion Energy can be Lead Out include:
- Number of Pulses per revolution
- Strength of each Pulse
- Strength of the Permanent Magnets and Current to the Coils
- Speed of rotation
- Efficiency of the Pulse Force (Tangential to rotation best)
- Mass of the rotating cylinder (the flywheel effect)
- The program to adjust the Input according to External Load
- Sensing mechanism

The two proven balanced rotational systems that can generate substantial power are:
(1) The 225 HP Pulse Motor developed in USA - 9 slices each generates > 20 HP.
(2) The Liang IC Pulse Motor developed in China - 700 IC pairs generate > 188HP.
(3) Both have program control to adjust Input according to External Load.
(4) Many variations of (1) are being developed in China. The likely product from General Magnetics 磁普of China is likely to be a Generator for a small village based on the technology in (1).
(5) Independently, Dr. Liang Xingren is developing Electricity Generators in Southern China based on his technology.

My plan is to discuss (1) in much greater detail and then invite International Interested Groups to develop some versions of (1). One hidden agenda is to improve it to produce the Flying Saucer.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The eighth Step
Post time: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:36:44 (GMT 0)

The Seventh Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:01:29 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Step 7 The extension to unbalanced rotations

We can refer to the LHS diagram of Slide 10 in http://www.energyfromair.com/beijing/taiwan2a.htm.

In the diagram, a small weight is attached to the rim of a balanced wheel. On a slight push, the small weight will swing up and then swing back. The action is identical to that of a Pendulum. If the wheel is spun in a complete circle, its rotational speed will slow down when the weight goes up. Its rotational speed will speed up when the weight goes down. Thus we have deceleration and acceleration. When we have deceleration and acceleration, Newton�s Laws demand the presence of a force.

Thus if we give the unbalanced wheel a reasonable speed of rotation first, the deceleration and acceleration acts like a Pull or Push. If the timing is correct, gravitational energy can be Lead Out. It might be possible for the unbalanced wheel to attain perpetual motion due to the Lead Out gravitational energy. However, this has to be done exactly right. The more practical designs would involve falling hammers, falling weights, rotating arms etc. Many claimed to have developed such devices. The most famous one is the Bessler Wheel
(see http://www.besslerwheel.com).

However, to be successful, these devices will have to have large diameter; have heavy weights at the rim to provide the flywheel effect and well timed pulsing mechanisms. The chance of such devices becoming practical electricity generators is slime.

The Wang Shum Ho Device is probably one of the exceptions. It uses the coupling of two systems: a ferro-liquid rotation system + a solid magnet rotation system. The solid magnet rotation system is effectively an unbalanced rotation. The repulsion is enhanced by setting the magnets at the stator at special angles and the proper use of magnetic shielding material. Similar effects have been demonstrated in the David Hamel device (http://davidhamel.com/). The most interesting part is the experimental part of having a circular magnet on top of a ball. Another ring of magnets is placed on top. The magnet with the ball will rotate. Similar experiments have been done using magnets taped to the handle of a screw driver. The ring of magnets would force the screw driver to rotate.

Another demonstration is the self-accelerating pulse motor described in Overunity.com titled Working Attraction Magnet Motor on Youtube!? (http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3482.msg54724#msg54724)

The Wang device is worth special mentioning because it was first demonstrated openly in an invention show in China in 1997. A few thousand people saw the demonstration but he could not get support. He did not have a coherent theory then. We helped to provide the theory and to promote him via the Internet. He demonstrated his device to 5 Officials on January 15, 2007 in Beijing. By June 2007, he was made one of the nine vice presidents of General Magnetics 磁普 (a RMB 13 billion Company).

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Seventh Step
Post time: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:01:29 (GMT 0)

The Sixth Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:22:17 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Step 6 The extension to Electric Fields (Electron Motion)

The first extension is to Electrostatics. We are familiar with electric charges. Electrons carry negative charge and protons carry positive charge. When there is a excess amount of Electrons concentrated in one area, that area will shows properties of negative charge. When there is a decrease number of Electrons in one area, that areas will shows properties of positive charge. We focus on Electrons because they are light, reside outside the nucleus and can roam about relatively freely. The protons, on the other hand, are rigidly bound with the neutrons inside the nucleus.

Electrostatic charges have similar attraction and repulsion properties as magnetic poles. We can obviously use similar techniques such as electrically negative pendulum swinging in electric field. However, Electricity has much closer ties with Electron Motion. We may be able to do much better.

We all know that Direct Current (D.C.) is due to Electron Motion in one direction. Alternating Current (A.C.) is due to Electron Motion in both directions. Electron Motion clearly has energy associated with it. The existing belief is that an external source of energy must be used to generate electricity. The most common external sources of energy include chemical (batteries), solar and mechanical rotation (turbines).

The Lee-Tseung theory predicts that Gravitational Energy is another possible source. The known mechanism is via Pulse (periodically repeated Pushes or Pulls) at the right time. The differential and integral vector mathematics or the application of the Law of Parallelogram of Forces clearly demonstrated that the Tension of the String contributed to the lifting of the pendulum bob. This contribution is the Lead Out energy from gravity.

The Forever Yuen experiments with magnetic pendulums clearly demonstrated that if gravitational energy can be Lead Out, electron motion (magnetic) energy will also be Lead Out.

If we can somehow cause Electron Motion, we should be able to get Energy. Joseph Newman and others found that the Drive Coil and the Pickup Coil can be the same physical coil. With suitable circuits and arrangements, seemingly dead batteries could be recharged. A battery driven car appeared to draw no chemical energy from the battery. Newman and others called this as - charging by back EMF. However, their explanation fell short of explaining the source of Energy. Can Energy be created from nothing? If so, is the Law of Conservation of Energy violated?

The correct answer is that NO Energy was created from nothing. Energy has been Lead Out from Gravitational and Magnetic Fields. The Law of Conservation of Energy is never violated.

The Adams Motor demonstrated that the Drive Coil and the Pickup Coil could be separate Coils. However, Newman, Bedini and Adams never had the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory to guide their development. They did not appreciate the importance of having a mechanism or program to adjust the Input to the External Load.

They did not appreciate the importance of keeping the rotational speed and the effective pulsing high. They either allowed the rotational speed to decrease with External Load and thus greatly reduce the Lead Out Power. Or they "drifted" into non-resonance or bad timing pulses. The bad timing pulses will NOT lead out gravitational or electron motion energy. The analogy is pushing the Swing at the wrong time.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Sixth Step
Post time: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:22:17 (GMT 0)

The Fifth Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:34:46 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Step 5 The extension to Magnetic Fields (Electron Motion)

The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum conclusively proved that if we could Lead Out Gravitational Energy, we should be able to Lead Out Magnetic Energy. The additional advantage of Leading Out Magnetic Energy include:

(1) Magnets can have both attraction and repulsion

(2) The direction of magnetic field can be controlled by researcher

(3) The magnetic field can be turned on and off via electromagnetic coils

(4) The strength of the Magnetic Field can be many times that of the Gravitational Field

(5) Magnetic Field comes from the orbiting electrons. Unless the electrons stop rotating and fall into the nucleus, there will be magnetic field due to motion of the electrons. It is a matter of aligning and using such energy. The Law of Conservation of Energy is never violated.

(6) Even in outer space when the net gravitational field is small, there can still be strong magnetic fields produced by permanent or electromagnets.

(7) The rapid turning off or withdrawing of the magnetic force can produce the Flying Saucer effect. Flying in any direction or hovering is possible without ejecting any material.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Fifth Step
Post time: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:34:46 (GMT 0)

Re: COP for subsequent pulls?

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:01:19 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

The full explanation and calculation is in:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2794.msg55320.html#msg55320

See the attached file in Reply 550.

The COP for the case of a 30 degree position and displacement of 2 degrees is approximately 1.70! The Pull Force is perpendicular to the direction of Motion.

When the same formula is used in the 0 degree position, the COP was 1.499543 which is close to 1.5.

After careful thought, I believe the best way of Pushing or Pulling the Pendulum is always perpendicular to the arc of Motion. The first Push or Pull should be horizontal.

The calculation follows strictly the concept of differential and integral mathematics. Vector Arithmatic is used. This is an even better starting point as viewed by a theoretician.

Lawrence Tseung
Pulling perpendicular to arc of motion Leads Out the most gravitational energy.

The more I think about the above, the more I am convinced that it is correct. God (Jesus, Buddha, Allah) has given the infinite, pollution free, readily-available gravitational and electron motion energy to us. We never use it. We chose to pollute our environment with the limited fossil fuel instead.

Is Human Race that stupid???

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Re: COP for subsequent pulls?
Post time: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:01:19 (GMT 0)

Comments on balanced rotations

guest@go-here.nl forever — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:14:45 (GMT 0)

Comments on balanced rotations

1.The best way of leading energy out from a pendulum is to apply a pull force perpendicular to the direction of the moving arc.

2.Intuitively, I believe the best way to lead out energy from a rotating cylinder is also to provide forces perpendicular to the direction of movement.

3.This means applying the force tangentially.

What do you think about my intuition?

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: forever
Subject: Comments on balanced rotations
Post time: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:14:45 (GMT 0)

Extending to magnetic fields

guest@go-here.nl forever — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:05:00 (GMT 0)

Extending to magnetic fields

In my experiment, I used a magnet A to replace the pendulum bob. I also used another magnet B to attract or repel it.

1.In attraction, the frequency of oscillation increased. This has the same effect of increasing the gravitational constant g. g is normally 9.8 m/s/s. In attraction, that value may be 10.2 m/s/s or more. More energy can be lead out if g increases.

2.In repulsion, the frequency of oscillation decreased. g can be 8.2m/s/s or less. This means the effective weight of the bob decreases.

3.We can make the repulsion so strong that g is equal to zero. This means the pendulum can flow in mid air. We can make the repulsion so strong that g is negative. This means that the pendulum bob can rise. (Ms. Wini Woo first pointed this out to Tseung.)

4.The energy does not come from the energy inside the permanent magnets. A permanent magnet can be produced (or refreshed) by providing x units of energy to a magnetic material. The extra energy lead out can be much more than x.

5.Tseung used the concept of magnetism as a result of electron motion. When an electron moves in a circular orbit, it produces magnetism. This is what Tseung refer to as the electron motion energy. So long as there are atoms, there will be orbiting electrons. We are surrounded by such electron motion fields all the time. Thus, conservation of energy has not been violated. We can just using the electron motion energy that already surrounds us.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: forever
Subject: Extending to magnetic fields
Post time: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:05:00 (GMT 0)

Comments on the new calculation

guest@go-here.nl forever — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:41:39 (GMT 0)

Comments on the new calculation

1.I have now studied the new calculation and the associated spreadsheet.

2.It should be within the capability of the top physics students in secondary school. It should be very easy for the university and graduate students in physics.

3.Intuitively the best way to push a swing is not always horizontal. It should be at a slight downward angle when the swing reaches its highest position. The mathematics indicates that the push should be perpendicular to the arc motion.

4.In the previous calculations, Tseung used horizontal pulse forces. The pendulum bob rose in height. In physics, a horizontal force cannot do vertical work unless some type of machine is used to change the direction. Tseung concluded that the work done in the vertical position was due to the tension in the string.

5.In the new calculation, the pull force can be at any angle (perpendicular to the arc of motion) when Tseung used the example of pulling from 30degress to 32 degrees. There will be two forces contributing to lifting the pendulum bob. These two forces are the vertical components of the Tension in the String and the Pull Force. This example clearly shows that Tension of the String is an important contributor. This contribution is what Tseung refer to as the Lead Out gravitational energy.

6.So long as there is energy lead out, we can get more output energy than input. This extra output energy is not created from nothing. It is acquired from the gravitational field that already surrounds us.

I think I really understood now.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: forever
Subject: Comments on the new calculation
Post time: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:41:39 (GMT 0)

Force calculations

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:53:50 (GMT 0)

The Overunity Forum is having database errors. Some of the information from the calculation file is reproduced here:

The figure is omitted for now:
when F1p applied perpendicular to Arc of motion
F1s = Mcos(a)
F1p = Msin(a)

Quote:

When we consider what are the forces in the direction of displacement, we get

Horizontally: Hori component of F1p = Msin(a)*cos(a)

Vertically:
Vert component of F1s + Vert component of F1p
= Mcos(a)*cos(a) + Msin(a) *sin(a)
= M(cos(a)cos(a) + sin(a)sin(a)
= M

To be more exact, the hori component of Pull F1p will be equal and opposite to the hori component of the String Tension F1s. However, when we consider work done, the only force that is in direction of displacement is F1p. F1s is in opposite direction and can be considered as energy stored via the tension of the string.

Similarly, the vert forces in the upward direction (in direction of displacement) are from F1s and F1p. It should be clear from the diagram that both F1s and F1p contributed to the lifting of the Bob.

Energy Considerations in Pulling th Bob from 30 to 32 degrees.

We can consider the work done or energy stored in the vertical and in the horizontal direction separately.

The vertical and horizontal displacements are exact mathematical calculations. No approximation is needed. However, the Forces at 30, 31 and 32 degrees are slightly different. Since we are willing to accept approximations to bring out the physical meaning, we shall use the largest Pull force at 32 degrees.

Horizontal Energy of the Pull Force = Msin(32)*cos(32) *0.029919L
= 0.013446* ML

Vertical Energy of the Pull Force = Msin(32)*sin(32)* 0.017977L
= 0.005048*ML

Total Work done or Energy supplied by Pull Force = 0.018494*ML

Lead Out Energy = Vertical Work Done by Tension of String F1s
= Mcos(32)*cos(32)*0.017977L
= 0.012929*ML

COP = Output Energy / Input Energy
= (0.018494*ML+0.012929*ML)/0.018494*ML
= 1.699096
= 1.7 (even higher than 1.5!)

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Force calculations
Post time: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:53:50 (GMT 0)

The first 4 steps

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:06:48 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

I was delighted to find that the Mathematics indicated that the best way of Pulling and Leading Out Gravitational Energy was applying the Pull perpendicular to the arc of motion for the pendulum.

It makes the extension to Pulsed Rotation much easier. This much clearer picture will help the Lee-Tseung theory more.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The first 4 steps
Post time: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:06:48 (GMT 0)

Email to Patrick Kelly

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:27:00 (GMT 0)

Dear Patrick,

Thank you for your email. I have now completed the calculation of COP for second and subsequent Pulls on the simple pendulum.

See: http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=338#338

The calculation showed that the best way to pull and to lead out energy from the simple pendulum is to apply the Pull perpendicular to the arc of motion.

This could have been guessed intuitively. However, when the mathematics confirm it, the confidence goes up much more.

The Liang Motor is one of the few that does not rotate in a magnetic field. The fact that we cannot tilt its axle confirms that it uses the lead out gravitational energy. Pulsed rotation in gravitational field alone could generate 188 HP.

Thus I am confident that the 225 HP Pulse Motor is not a hoax. The key to the success of both Motors is the computer program that adjusts the input to the external load.

Lawrence

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Email to Patrick Kelly
Post time: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:27:00 (GMT 0)

COP for subsequent pulls?

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:36:52 (GMT 0)

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: COP for subsequent pulls?
Post time: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:36:52 (GMT 0)

The displacement calculations

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:10:27 (GMT 0)

The calculation of displacement can be exact. We can find out the vertical and horizontal displacements at 30 degrees and at 32 degrees. The difference will be the exact vertical and horizontal displacement from 30 to 32 degrees.

The formulae are:
Horizontal Displacement = Lsin(a)
Vertical Displacement = L(1-cos(a))

Substituting the actual values:
Displacement at 30 degrees
Horizontal = Lsin(30) = 0.5L
Vertical = L(1-cos(30)) = 0.133975L
Displacement at 32 degrees
Horizontal = Lsin(32) = 0.525919L
Vertical = L(1-cos(32)) = 0.151952L

Displacement from 30 to 32 degrees
Horizontal = 0.525919L - 0.5L = 0.025919L
Vertical = 0.151962L - 0.133975L = 0.017977L

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The displacement calculations
Post time: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:10:27 (GMT 0)

Re: The simple pendulum

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 06:30:32 (GMT 0)

Anonymous wrote:

Dear Mr. Tseung,

If the first Push provides a COP of 1.5, how about the second Pull, the third and subsequent Pulls?

This is an excellent question.

I shall simplify it with an actual example. Let us assume:

(1) The Pendulum has swung to an angle of 30 degrees on the LHS.
(2) The Pull Force will further increase the angle from 30 degrees to 32 degrees.
(3) You may use further simplifications but please state them,

We should be able to use the Law of Parallelogram of Forces to this particular situation. It may not be an exact solution. The approximation will give us much additional insight.

Any one willing to take on this challenge?

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Re: The simple pendulum
Post time: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 06:30:32 (GMT 0)

The simple pendulum

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:26:00 (GMT 0)

Dear Mr. Tseung,

If the first Push provides a COP of 1.5, how about the second Pull, the third and subsequent Pulls?

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: Anonymous
Subject: The simple pendulum
Post time: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:26:00 (GMT 0)

Summary of the First 4 Steps

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:31:32 (GMT 0)

Summary of the First 4 Steps

The first 4 steps essentially describe a particular way of moving the simple Pendulum. The stationary pendulum is

(1) Pushed to the LHS by a horizontal force without letting it go. The Pendulum Bob will go up because of the tension in the string. The horizontal force cannot do work in the vertical direction by itself. It can do horizontal work. The vertical work (lifting of the Pendulum Bob) is done by the tension in the string. This is the Lead Out Gravitational Energy.

(2) The Pendulum is still at rest but now a Pull force is applied. This Pull Force is no longer horizontal. It is tangential to the arc of motion. This Pull Force can do work both vertically and horizontally. However, some of the vertical work is done by the tension of the string. This is also a methord of Leading Out Gravitational Energy.

(3) The Pendulum is then let go. It will swing from its maximum position on the LHS to its maximum position on the RHS. During this �let go� period, no more Push or Pull force is applied. There will be no more Leading Out of Gravitational Energy during this swinging period. If there were no losses of energy due to friction, air resistance etc., the swinging motion should continue forever. Now, when the Pendulum Bob swings to its maximum position on the RHS, another Pull Force tangential to the arc of motion is applied. This Pull Force will also Lead Out Gravitational Energy.

(4) Both Pull Energy and Lead Out Gravitational Energy are added by repeating (2) and (3). The amplitude of the Swing increases. If no more Pull Force were applied at any time, the Pendulum would swing with the acquired amplitude and kept swinging forever at that amplitude if there were no energy loss. This is the true understanding of the "periodically pulled" or pulsed Pendulum.

This new understanding of the Pulsed Pendulum explains the Lead Out Gravitational Energy much more clearly.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Summary of the First 4 Steps
Post time: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:31:32 (GMT 0)

Re: The Development Center

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:07:15 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Ash and Patrick talked about working with a local university and having a proper research and development center in Australia.

Stimulating or creating organisations and giving them pet titles is not going to lead out results. Anyone should be welcome to read, write, analyse, experiment and construct. We don't need this hidden behind university doors. By definition people become teachers because they lack initiative in the field they are educated in. They might enjoy themselves by teaching but they need to educate the passion for the work. This is something most of them just don't have. At best they have a passion for education.

Ironically, the people who do have the passion would think twice before sharing his most precious thoughts with some uninspired student. The conclusion I made is that peeps primarily need to educate themselves. It's nice to have some one there to talk about progress and answer an occasional question, that's about it? The rest should be blamed on the study material.

Good educational material can be made fun and entertaining. Everyone is lying where they argue education is suppose to be boring and dusty. Having fun is self energising, a person can study unlimited amount of data if he actually enjoys doing it. UNLIMITED!

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: Re: The Development Center
Post time: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:07:15 (GMT 0)

The Fourth Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:41:26 (GMT 0)

Quote:

Step (4) The subsequent repeat of (2) and (3)

The start of this Step happens after the pendulum is released from the maximum position after Steps (3) The Pendulum Bob has acquired the energy from Push (1), Pull (2), and Pull (3) PLUS the Lead Out gravitational energies.

When released from the maximum position on the LHS/RHS, the Bob swings back to the RHS/LHS. If there were no loss of energy, the Bob will reach the maximum mirror position on the RHS/LHS. If there were no subsequent Pulls, the Pendulum would keep swinging forever assuming no loss of energy.

*** There is no additional Gravitational Energy during the swing. There is energy change from potential to kinetic etc.***

At the Maximum LHS or RHS position, before the Bob changes direction, a Pull in the tangential direction to the movement arc is applied. This Pull will have both vertical and horizontal components.

However, the Tension of the String still contributes to the vertical energy. Gravitational Energy is again Lead Out.[/quote]

Thus the amplitude of the swing increases. Most of the time, no gravitational energy is Lead Out. However, there is Lead Out Gravitational Energy during the application of the many Pulls.

These Pulls must be applied at the right time. This right time is what we referred to as resonance. Continued Pulling will produce a much larger angle, the ratio of (Lead Out Energy / Pull Energy) will drop from 0.5 to a much lower figure.

Thus the Pulsed (periodically pulled) Pendulum is NOT the most efficient Gravitational Energy Lead Out machine.

*** If the applied pull is always in the horizontal direction, the bob will not rise above the pivot point of the string. However, the tension will keep increasing. This is the reason why bridges can break apart at resonance. The many small pulls can indeed add together to infinity!!!

This new understanding of the destructive force at resonance will have important impact in our daily lives.***

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Fourth Step
Post time: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:41:26 (GMT 0)

Speculative specification of lead out energy

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:20:46 (GMT 0)

Today I have decided that the potential to do work flows from the MACRO cosmos of the things very large, huge, enormous and even beyond comprehension in size towards the MICRO cosmos of the things very small, tiny, microscopical and of equally uncomprehendable size.

It may sound like philosophy or poetry but this part of physics is vastly limited by the fixed size of the organism doing the research.

I'm not joking! The amount of influence the researcher has on his experiment is of infinite magnitude.

So, when you bang your head on your desk it's a galactical event in all the ways it needs to be to qualify as such.

The resonating table will transmute it's large low frequency amplitude into lots and lots of small bits of high frequency table shaking. All still relatively of course, if size is irrelevant those small waves are of course exactly as big as the big one's. There is only a relative size difference.

Thus the small waves become smaller and smaller etc etc. Closed system energy conservation is something we should laugh about.

Sure, maybe a potential needs a source I can understand such assumptions but closed systems really do not exist. We burn off all our fuel, this energy doesn't just disappear. It phases into the realm of the very small.

In the realm of the very small the effect of striking the table with your head triggers an infinite chain reaction down to ever smaller and smaller galaxies, universes, dimensions heaven's what ever you want to call it.

The most scary part is that the �ther is alive! It's of time indifferent intellect.

Now that what we call energy is flowing from A to B, like a river or like wind.

We can user 100 kg of water to lift up 10 kg.

This should basically explain why all those pulsed electricity recycling tricks (like teal Newman and Bedini used) can actually work.

But now that I've discovered the linear resonance of standing waves it's obvious to me that one can sale upwind just like in any other sailboat.

I now know that 2 objects can "collide" accelerating the faster moving object AND the slower moving one.

-gaby

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Speculative specification of lead out energy
Post time: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:20:46 (GMT 0)

The Third Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:03:16 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Step (3) The third pull after the pendulum swings to the maximum position on the RHS

This Step happens after the pendulum is released from the maximum position after Steps (1) and (2) on the LHS. The Pendulum Bob has acquired the energy from Push (1) and Pull (2) PLUS the Lead Out gravitational energies.

When released from the maximum position on the LHS, the Bob swings back to the RHS. If there were no loss of energy, the Bob will reach the maximum mirror position on the RHS.

*** There is no additional Gravitational Energy after the release. There is energy change from potential to kinetic etc.***

At the Maximum RHS position, before the Bob changes direction, a Pull in the tangential direction to the movement arc is applied. This Pull will have both vertical and horizontal components.

However, the Tension of the String still contributes to the vertical energy. Gravitational Energy is again Lead Out.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Third Step
Post time: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:03:16 (GMT 0)

The Second Step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:36:44 (GMT 0)

Quote:

Step (2) The second pull from the maximum position on LHS

This step is a change from push in Step (1) to a pull. It can be treated as a simple extension of Step (1).

We introduced the concept that Push and Pull could have the same effect.

Since it is an extension of Step (1), there will be Lead Out Gravitational Energy via the Tension in the String.

The slight modification is that the pull force is no longer horizontal. It is tangential to the radius of the movement arc. When resolved into horizontal and vertical directions, there is a vertical component contributing directly to lifting the bob upwards.

However, the Tension of the String will still contribute.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Second Step
Post time: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:36:44 (GMT 0)

The first step

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:02:15 (GMT 0)

Quote:

Step (1) The first push of the pendulum from rest position to LHS

We can clearly apply the Vector Mathematics of Integrals to this situation. This case has the horizontal force applied all the way. We can use the Law of parallelogram of forces. We can resovle the displacement into the vertical and horizontal components. We can also resolve the force into the vertical and horizontal components.

This analysis shows that some energy must come from the tension of the string. (Hroizontal force without the use of machines such as pulleys, levers etc. cannot do work in the vertical direction.)

This "string energy" is the Lead Out Gravitational Energy.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The first step
Post time: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:02:15 (GMT 0)

The Development Center

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:07:12 (GMT 0)

The Development Center for the Theoretical Ideal Pulse Motor project

Ash and Patrick talked about working with a local university and having a proper research and development center in Australia.

I personally want to go one step further. I would like to have multiple Universities and/or Research Organizations working on it simultaneously. Thus I shall continue to laid out my Gift of Wisdom despite the insults.

Rather than having one group that might be infiltrated by the CIA or the Like and destroyed from within,I would like to have many groups working on similar projects. Some groups want to share information. Some may want to walk away from the limelight. The CIA or the Like Group might want to discredit us.

They are likely to use much more subtle methods than claiming that they have completely and utterly refuted our Theory by staring at a desk pendulum toy. But I enjoy discussing the Laws and Principles of Physics. That happens to be my strong side. I expect much of the attack will come in on the experimental side. They will publish erroneous results to confuse. They may try some tricks such as "the magnetic pendulum showed zero changes in oscillation frequency." Fortunately such outright lies could easily be rebuffed by simple experiments.

As in the Sunday Sermon and from the Advice of the Wise Monk, if God is your partner, why worry?

Lawrence Tseung
Fear of CIA or the Like Leads Out multiple team approach from the scared Tseung

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The Development Center
Post time: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:07:12 (GMT 0)

Re: The gift from God (Jesus, Budda, Allah)

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:39:22 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

The gift from God (Jesus, Buddha, Allah)

The Sunday Sermon was related to Gift from God. Everyone received one or more gifts.

Lawrence Tseung
Gift from God and having God as a Partner Lead Out great dreams and great deeds.

This gift should be used together with the New Order and the book discussions to benefit the World.

http://www.energyfromair.com/thebook.htm. (The last pages are in English)

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Re: The gift from God (Jesus, Budda, Allah)
Post time: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:39:22 (GMT 0)

Using the Adams Motor as a base

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:59:38 (GMT 0)

Using the Adams Motor as a base

It appears that the detailed information in building an Adams Motor is available. If done properly, the COP could be more than 7.

If that were the case, should we build an Adams Motor as a base first?

We know that Pulse Motors work on "resonance". Even seemingly slight modification would change its efficiency and render it useless.

But a working, demonstrated device in the hands of the development group would provide much confidence.

Lawrence Tseung
Having a working device as a base Leads Out confidence from the development team

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Using the Adams Motor as a base
Post time: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:59:38 (GMT 0)

The gift from God (Jesus, Budda, Allah)

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:55:01 (GMT 0)

The gift from God (Jesus, Buddha, Allah)

The Sunday Sermon was related to Gift from God. Everyone received one or more gifts. Many of us never opened our Gifts. Some opened the box but did not take it out. Some took it out but kept it to themselves. A few used them to benefit themselves and the World - fulfilling the purpose of the Gift.

It does not matter whether one is religious. The sermon gave a clear direction for us to use our gifts. We all have one or more of these gifts. They include (from the sermon):Administration, Apostleship, Discernment, Encouragement, Evangelism, Faith, Giving, Healing, Helping, Hospitality, Interpretation, Knowledge, Leadership, Mercy, Miracles, Pastoring, Prophecy, Teaching, Tongues and Wisdom.

I believe I have the box labeled Wisdom. I can now describe how Cosmic Energy can be Lead Out from:
(1) The first push of the pendulum from rest position to LHS
(2) The second pull from the maximum position on LHS
(3) The third pull after the pendulum swings to the maximum position on the RHS
(4) The subsequent repeat of (2) and (3)
(5) The extension to Magnetic Fields (Electron Motion)
(6) The extension to Electric Fields (Electron Motion)
(7) The extension to unbalanced rotations
(8 ) The extension to pulsed balanced rotations
(9) The extension to flux change systems
(10) The extension to Flying Saucers

It was like building the jigsaw puzzle. Lee and I had the basic idea. As we put in additional pieces, the picture becomes clearer and clearer. Many of you helped in the process, especially Gaby, Stefan, Ash, Patrick Kelly, Peter Chan, Sun et al, Raymond Ting and Forever Yuen, etc. Some who poured insults also helped - in training us to be cool in important meetings.

I shall use this gift first with the developers including Newman, Bedini, Adams, Campbell, Milkovic, Searl, Wang, Liang, Chao, Tsing Hua, Bejing and other Universities to complete a solid overview with theories and working prototypes. The next task will be to work with Product Companies. My goal is to use this Gift to benefit the World.

Lawrence Tseung
Gift from God and having God as a Partner Lead Out great dreams and great deeds.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: The gift from God (Jesus, Budda, Allah)
Post time: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:55:01 (GMT 0)

Re: Comment from Patrick Kelly

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:46:59 (GMT 0)

Anonymous wrote:

Patrick Kelly commented:

May be the Adams Motor is a better Motor to start.

Quote:

I would suggest an Adams motor style of drive, where the pulse frequency is controlled by the electronics alone, allowing a constant rate to be maintained. You are also liable to run into patent restrictions if you select a Bedini drive as his pulse drive has been patented and is not open-source unlike the Adams motor design which is free to everyone.

Some information on Adams Motor is available in:
http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?t=59
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/1287/adams/adamsall.htm

I used the terms Drive Coils and Pickup Coils from that video.

Thank you, Patrick.

I still think we only need charge coils. Over a year ago I suggested to abandon communicators and electronics for mechanical solutions.

I also implemented the 90 degree interaction here but that should not prevent you from understanding the mechanical timing shown here.

In the fluxlaminator I've also implemented flux switching into the design. This allows for the rotor to be it's own timing device. That what a reed switch tries to do. Think about it! Using magnetic flux to make electricity then using the electricity to make flux again? Why would we do that?

Think of 2 wheels and think of using the pulse to bridge the flux into interaction. I'm convinced it can do work, I don't care if I have to use 100 wheels. lol I have 100 other ideas as backup this one will be a good study.

must illustrate something else now.... haha...

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Re: Comment from Patrick Kelly
Post time: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:46:59 (GMT 0)

Reply to Gaby's Mercy Plead for the reel switches

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:16:13 (GMT 0)

In reply 543 at the overunity.com thread, Gaby commented:

Quote:

I think people should have more mercy on their reed switches.

I seem to recall the Newman and the Bedini Motors showed a bright electric arc during their operation. Does that imply that energy is dissipated via the arc?

Is so, the Newman and the Bedini (and many others) Motors might already be reasonable Cosmic Energy Machines Leading Out significant Gravitational and/or Electron Motion (magnetic or electric) energy. They were kept from burning out via the discharging arc!

When they were treated like black boxes for testing, the external load or torque immediately reduced the rotation rate of the rotor. This not only reduced the Lead Out Energy but also might have shifted the required "timing or resonance" conditions. Newman and Bedini were lucky to discover that charging of dead batteries could be done.

So it was not their pulse rotating motors did not Lead Out energy and generate more Output Power. It was their lack of a mechanism or program to adjust input according to output that caused their failure. The 225 HP Pulse Motor and the Liang IC Pulse Motor had the control programs. Thus they were able to generate much electricity (over 100 KW).

Is it possible that the Lee-Tseung theory can improve the many known Cosmic Energy Inventions via just one simple suggestion??? Introduce the Input-Output adjustment mechanism or program!!!

Lawrence Tseung
Gaby�s Mercy Plead Leads Out the daring thought from the old Tseung.

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Reply to Gaby's Mercy Plead for the reel switches
Post time: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:16:13 (GMT 0)

Some initial thoughts on the Adams Motor

guest@go-here.nl ltseung888 — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:07:43 (GMT 0)

See the post on:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2794.msg54401.html#msg54401

Some interesting remarks:

The important design criterion include:

(1) Would the Input Current to the Drive Coils affect the Repulsion Force? Is the Repulsion Force proportional to the current?

(2) How is the Input Pulse Rate adjusted? Would it show resonance features?

(3) If the External Load changes, how would the Input Current be varied?

(4) If the Lead Out Energy were both Gravitational and Electron Motion (magnetic), should the rotational axle be horizontal? Or would the Electron Motion part be so large that ignoring the Gravitational might be acceptable?

(5) Should the Rotor part have enough mass as to have significant flywheel (cylinder) effect? On varying load some energy can be drawn out from the flywheel. The rotational speed can then be kept high and reasonably constant?

(6) Should we have a separate starting motor to get the rotor to the high designed speed? Or could the varying pulse rate be sufficient to send the rotor from rest to the high designed speed?

These questions and other similar ones will help to stimulate the minds of the inventors and implementers of the theoretically ideal pulse motor.

Lawrence Tseung
The Adams Motor Picture Leads Out many design questions

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: ltseung888
Subject: Some initial thoughts on the Adams Motor
Post time: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:07:43 (GMT 0)

Interesting posts from OverUnity.com

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:43:07 (GMT 0)

For those who want to get a full overview of the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory, please see that thread in Overunity.com from the very beginning.

Some of the more interesting recent ones include:
Reply 505, 513, 489, 470, 422, 421.

Lawrence Tseung
The desk pendulum toy Leads Out "Punch is not a Lee-Tseung Pulse"

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Interesting posts from OverUnity.com
Post time: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:43:07 (GMT 0)

Comment from Patrick Kelly

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:56:09 (GMT 0)

Patrick Kelly commented:

May be the Adams Motor is a better Motor to start.

Quote:

Forum: PULSE MOTOR
Topic: RE: Building the "theoretical ideal pulse motor"
Replies: 49
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Comment from Patrick Kelly
Post time: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:56:09 (GMT 0)