combo technology :: FORUM.GO-HERE.NL

Gravity assisted fluxswitching pendulum

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:27:34 (GMT 0)

You own 2 magnets?

Suspend something from one of the magnets so that you have a pendulum.

Now hover the pendulum over the side of the other magnet fixed/held onto the table.

Try approaching it from the repelling side holding it up far enough not to suffer repulsion.

It should now be possible for you to hover the pendulum (at reasonable height) approaching from the repelling side of the magnet while it's already attracted enough not to be pushed away. But when you leave(pass) this triangle/line the attraction, repulsion and induction(!) preform work in the verysame direction.

I have illustrated the flux switching pendulum here.

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=524

I'm still looking for some one with 2 magnets to replicate the motor.

I'm convinced you can do it, who ever you are.

May the force be with you huh?

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: Gravity assisted fluxswitching pendulum
Replies: 0
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Gravity assisted fluxswitching pendulum
Post time: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:27:34 (GMT 0)

Re: counter-rotating-fields

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:58:30 (GMT 0)

gaby de wilde wrote:

Left is a primary axle with a magnet on top. Right is a secondary axle with a magnet on top. If there was no shield the secondary magnet would rotate along with the primary 1:1 With the shielding placed as illustrated (close to the domain wall a bit towards the primary side) the secondary magnet is is disconnected from the primary 2 times per rotation.

While the primary is facing the shield with both it's north and it's south pole (it's side) there isn't any flux propagated beyond it. Here the secondary axle stops and waits for the primary to move beyond this point. The moment the primary has moved beyond 50/50 induction the secondary will leap over the gap and catch up. The catching up power comes out of the magnet.

I can leave the primary in any position and it will just stay there. It's merely pulling the secondary into it's mirrored position when facing the shield. Should not be hard to test.

Just remember to place the conductor closer to the primary magnet.
[img]http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3650.0;attach=14726;image[/img]

CLaNZeR wrote:

12 different metal strips tested: Soft Aluminium, Brass, Copper, Mild Steel, Magnetic Stainless Steel, NON Magnetic Stainless Steel, Galvanised Steel, Hard Aluminium, Phosphor Bronze, Nickel Silver, Zinc Plated Mild Steel, Zinc

Movie showing all 12 metals being tested.
http://www.overunity.org.uk/CLaNZeR-doing-Gabys-PM-switch-test.wmv

I've remixed the video here

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=452
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4nDAuob2rQ

square is better tho
[img]http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3650.0;attach=14725;image[/img]

CLaNZeR wrote:

Will have a go with some small square Neo's tomorrow mate for you.
But I think you have proved your point and the saturation of the shield does stop the reaction on the opposite magnet.

Now show us how this could be used to get that free energy!!!

[img]http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3650.0;attach=14730;image[/img]
You stick a big magnet on a small electromotor, place the shield next to it big generator at the other side. I attached an image of the electrical setup we should work towards.

Can make it as big as you like. As long as it keeps spinning a big chunk of the load should just disappear in the coupling. (At least that's what I expect to happen.)

CLaNZeR wrote:

Nice remix Gaby ;D

Okay so let me get this right.

Take two motors and place a magnet on each.
Place a shield between the two with it closest to the primary.
Power primary motor up and spin primary magnet.
Secondary magnet will spin and play catch up.
Measure output of Secondary motor?

Is this correct, or am I just not getting it?

Yeah, that would be exactly the picture I had in mind

I didn't build anything of the sort tho. I enjoy thinking about it to much. It doesn't look that way but there are already a lot of different effects in this simple device. I have other weird effects I'm looking at but this one looks great also.

John Ecklin spins a rotor closing the loop on a horse shoe magnet.

http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/john-ecklin

He uses the flux to power a coil.

Wesley Gary inducts flux into a strip sitting between 2 magnets.

http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/wesley-gary

I'm spinning Ecklin's magnet rather then then it's core and I'm using that to induct flux into Mr Gary's strip.

huhuhuhu
____
http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: RE: paper: counter rotating fields
Replies: 3
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: Re: counter-rotating-fields
Post time: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:58:30 (GMT 0)

Vortex ram

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:52:04 (GMT 0)

I had envisioned drawing a vortex using a big dish a tube and a small dish.

I've made a page with an illustration here.

http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/vortex-ram

Let me think what you hear ok?

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: Vortex ram
Replies: 0
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: Vortex ram
Post time: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:52:04 (GMT 0)

WESLEY W. GARY - John W. Ecklin

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:48:42 (GMT 0)

Here are the 2 patents

PERMANENT MAGNET MOTION CONVERSION DEVICE John W. Ecklin

VIOTORS WESLEY- W. GARY

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: RE: paper: counter rotating fields
Replies: 3
Author: Anonymous
Subject: WESLEY W. GARY - John W. Ecklin
Post time: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:48:42 (GMT 0)

counter-rotating-fields

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:47:21 (GMT 0)

CLaNZeR wrote:

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: RE: paper: counter rotating fields
Replies: 3
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: counter-rotating-fields
Post time: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:47:21 (GMT 0)

paper: counter rotating fields

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:26:42 (GMT 0)

Quote:

COUNTER ROTATING FIELDS
ABSTRACT
Delayed magnetomecanical entrainment utilising 3 point interaction[1] by means of inductive shielding[2].
http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/text/counter-rotating-fields/

Left is a primary axle with a magnet on top. Right is a secondary axle with a magnet on top. If there was no shield the secondary magnet would rotate along with the primary 1:1 With the shielding placed as illustrated (close to the domain wall a bit towards the primary side) the secondary magnet is is disconnected from the primary 2 times per rotation.

While the primary is facing the shield with both it's north and it's south pole (it's side) there isn't any flux propagated beyond it. Here the secondary axle stops and waits for the primary to move beyond this point. The moment the primary has moved beyond 50/50 induction the secondary will leap over the gap and catch up. The catching up power comes out of the magnet.

I can leave the primary in any position and it will just stay there. It's merely pulling the secondary into it's mirrored position when facing the shield. Should not be hard to test. Just remember to place the conductor closer to the primary magnet.

CLaNZeR's website
http://www.overunity.org.uk

The overunity discussion
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3650.0.html

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: paper: counter rotating fields
Replies: 3
Author: Anonymous
Subject: paper: counter rotating fields
Post time: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:26:42 (GMT 0)

Bimetalmotor - Ambient heat gradient power

guest@go-here.nl Anonymous — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:36:03 (GMT 0)

10 km of bi-metal film rolled up into a nifty perpetual motion sausage.

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: Bimetalmotor - Ambient heat gradient power
Replies: 0
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Bimetalmotor - Ambient heat gradient power
Post time: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:36:03 (GMT 0)

improved pulse motor with multiple ring concept

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:02:31 (GMT 0)

ltseung888 wrote:

Let me put my understanding of Gaby's Improvement in pictorial form.

A = rotating inner cylinder in the clockwise direction
B = non-rotating ring of coils that can be switched on and off
C = non-rotating ring of permanent magnets suggested by Gaby.

With the magnetic poles as shown, if the coil in B has current off, the permanent magnet in C will induce a S pole (in coil at B) facing the rotating magnets in A. This effectively causes an attraction with the next coming permanent magnet in A (which is beneficial) causing further force to turn the cylinder A in the clockwise direction.

The permanent magnet in C does not draw any current. Gaby has improved the efficiency of the device!

This multiple ring concept is getting closer to the John Searl device. Let us have more of these brilliant ideas.

Lawrence Tseung
Gaby�s brilliant ideas Lead Out resonance from equally brilliant minds.

The other side of the coil can also be used. The force is available so it's wasteful not to use it.

This does not pull the rotor parallel to it's rim. So I've designed this sandwich.

The idea is the spin the top and the bottom disks in opposite direction (it would be interesting to speculate on spinning the center disk also)

By spinning both disks in opposite direction the forces on the wheel point round the rim and those working on the frame cancel out.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/665396/how_increase_speed_of_electric_motor/
How Increase Speed Of Electric Motor Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cevznlUzmK0&eurl=http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?t=5
YouTube - second motor in testing

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: RE: flux surfing
Replies: 1
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: improved pulse motor with multiple ring concept
Post time: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:02:31 (GMT 0)

flux surfing

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:26:40 (GMT 0)

Quote from: October 27, 2007, 10:20:55
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=2794.msg56442

Using multiple pulses takes a lot of stress off the bearings. ...

I will let you in on a little secret. The direction of the pulse should be almost straight towards the axle. It should also have some spring like storage. The pulse can then oppose the centrifugal forces and lead out it's power over a range of degrees rather then over a small angle of rotation.

Now for the flux:
Say the wheel has north poles facing outwards. The pulse coils have a ferromagnetic core.

Now we place an additional north pole BEHIND the coil.

The purpose of this magnet is to induct a bit of flux into the core.

The flux inducted into the core should not be enough to repel the rotor magnets by a very small bit.

The rotor magnet should also be able to induct it's field into the core.

We now have 2 opposing fields inducted into the core.

A slight pulse will be enough to generate FULL repulsion in this configuration.

But if you really want godly powers out of the machine then you make this happen by utilising back emf alone.

So the stator coil attracts the rotor magnet.

Then the flux collapses in the coil.

Now we get FULL repulsion at no cost of any kind.

Now I'm going back to my 100% permanent magnet designs. *hahaha*

Forever wrote:

on October 27, 2007, 09:55:39
5. This is what we mean by adjusting the input according to the output load. Most of the overunity developers have not done this( Newman, Bedini, Adams etc.)

But the rotoverter researchers have addressed this topic.

http://www.google.com/search?q=rotoverter

Ltseung wrote:

Gaby,

This post is very high quality. The suggestions will be carefully considered.

Regards,

Lawrence

I call it flux surfing. ^__^

If you rotate the stator magnet by 90 degrees you should be able to run the thing without any coils.

You can make it so that the repulsive front side doesn't get repelled until the backside is inducting it's field into it.

The field inducted by the rear end of the rotor magnet compliments the field inducted by the magnet that sits behind the core. Together they will fully saturnise the core.

This will both push and pull the magnet forwards, the strength of the push is very clear the pulling force is not much bigger a loss as a gain. The push is free.

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: flux surfing
Replies: 1
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: flux surfing
Post time: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:26:40 (GMT 0)

SMOT assisted gravity wheel utilising inwards spiral

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:04:30 (GMT 0)

The metal balls are first lifted by the smot, then dropped into the outer tube, the ball is guided inwards in a spiral, closer to the axle the wheel moves slower thus the ball is forced to slow down by this inwards motion, this is better as leaving the ball on the outer rim the way Chas build his device.

- Chas Campbel - pulsed Gravity wheel
- http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/smot
- http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/reidar-finsrud
- http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/vortex-engine

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: SMOT assisted gravity wheel utilising inwards spiral
Replies: 0
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: SMOT assisted gravity wheel utilising inwards spiral
Post time: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:04:30 (GMT 0)

Pulsed back emf battery charger build from transformer

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:49:28 (GMT 0)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7779695700888984638

Quote:

Note some of these experiments work by induction, and back emf in a very usable manner with results that seem like free energy. But how can we really be sure what is or is not free energy, thats always the question. Some of outcomes of these experiments do seem to fit in the area or title of free energy regardless if it is or is not. I like the name free energy and it seemed to fit the outcome of some of my experiments.
http://www.geocities.com/altenergy2007/

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: Pulsed back emf battery charger build from transformer
Replies: 0
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: Pulsed back emf battery charger build from transformer
Post time: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:49:28 (GMT 0)

Amplification of springs utilising magnetic fields

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:46:30 (GMT 0)

Winding or unwinding a flat spring within a magnetic field makes it behave dramatically different.

We can make the loops of the spring either attract or repel it self. For application of my 90 degree theory all we need is 3 points of magnetomechanical interaction in stead of 2.

Using a spring points 1 and 2 are the "rings" of the spring and point 3 is the magnet affecting it. Moving the magnet towards the spring should create an enormous difference in it's energy potential. A spring may have many layers. Each gap between 2 layers is subjected to either attraction or repulsion depending on the configuration.

I have 2 strips of metal here and a magnet and it looks to me like I'm right. A spring may be made of very thin and flexible material. Each extra layer makes the magnetic field more effective and such thin sheets barely offer any resistance while rewinding it outside the flux.

Quote:

Over half a thousand US Dollars worth of equipment... The second largest semiconductor currently in production... 260THOUSAND times the magnetic field strength of Earth... 22.7 MILLION Watts of electricity... Enough energy to kill a person 250 times over... Enough power during a single discharge to supply a large city... A 20 kilogram + device...Several days worth of work... The ability to smash an aluminium can with no physical contact, and to do it so fast and heat it so much in the process that it sounds as though the can is exploding as the drink inside it boils off...
http://www.powerlabs.org/pssecc.htm

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: Amplification of springs utilising magnetic fields
Replies: 0
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: Amplification of springs utilising magnetic fields
Post time: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:46:30 (GMT 0)

combination of the milkovic, newman and finsrud devices

guest@go-here.nl gaby de wilde — Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:23:55 (GMT 0)

After figuring out the Newman machine works with 90 degree magneto mechanical interaction[1][2][3] we should use it to power the Milkovic pendulum[4]. I imagine the 2 mA of energy consumption may go up to 3 or maybe even 4 with an unbalanced rotor.

For the communicator a strip of iron is suspended in the path of the pendulum. If the pendulum moves to the left the strip of iron is pushed against the contacts at the left, when the pendulum swings to the right the strip of iron is pushed towards 2 other contacts. This gives us the bi-directional pulse force we need to leed out from.

The weight of the pendulum needs to be increased to balance the input with the output. I'm sure the Newman machine will power the pendulum at the expense of minimal current. The drag a dynamo placed onto the bike wheel presents to the system needs to be balanced with the pendulum again.

I think it's not possible to create a configuration that doesn't slow down or speed up thus centrifugal force should be engineered to work on that part of the pendulum pushing against the communicator. The pulse should only occur if the oscillatory speed of said pendulum is low enough. A hanging flap pushing against a hanging flap. I've made a topic on the superconductive bearing[5] Finsrud used.

[1] - The theory behind the Joseph Newman Motor
[2] - 90 degree magneto mechanical interaction
[3] - http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/joseph-newman
[4] - http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/veljko-milkovic
[5] - Finsrud's superconductive bearings http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?t=10

Forum: COMBO TECHNOLOGIES
Topic: combination of the milkovic, newman and finsrud devices
Replies: 0
Author: gaby de wilde
Subject: combination of the milkovic, newman and finsrud devices
Post time: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:23:55 (GMT 0)